![]() ![]() If the public sector is to provide an LRT system that is cost effective and able to respond to the demands imposed by climate change, then it needs to be considered from a life-cycle perspective and funding sought from the private sector to ensure its viability.Judges in common law countries have long presented the principle of open justice as an essential element of rule of law. building information modelling) and (4) asset management (e.g. design-build-finance-operate) (3) digitization (e.g. ![]() It is suggested that the key enablers of future-proofing LRT are (1) private finance (2) delivery strategy (e.g. It is suggested that the public sector should move beyond focusing on strategic misrepresentation and optimism bias, as many governments worldwide now have in place mechanisms to address such issues, and instead focus on future-proofing their assets. ![]() The aim of this paper is to examine the equivocality that surrounds the determination of cost performance of LRT projects. More often than not, operational expenditure (OPEX) is neglected, and is not considered a part of the transportation cost performance literature. In tackling such increases, emphasis is placed on mitigating strategic misrepresentation and optimism bias, which has hindered the public sectors ability to embrace innovation, particularly with regard to the justification and adoption of LRT. ![]() The cost performance of Light Rail Transit (LRT) systems have been scrutinized by the popular press and public sector infrastructure agencies as they have been prone to incurring cost increases in their capital expenditures (CAPEX). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |